Skip to content
VTValiTracAI
Metrology

Correlated inputs in uncertainty evaluation

Root-sum-of-squares assumes independence. When two inputs move together — the same reference used twice, for example — the combination must include a correlation term.

ValiTrac AI editorialUpdated 2026-09-132 min read

The familiar u_c² = Σ(c_i u_i)² holds only for uncorrelated inputs. When inputs share a source of variation, cross terms appear. Ignoring them can understate the uncertainty (positive correlation) or overstate it (negative correlation, as in a difference measurement with a common reference).

Where it shows up in temperature work

  • Mapping studies: all loggers calibrated against the same reference share its error; the uncertainty of a difference between two loggers is smaller than naïve combination suggests, while the uncertainty of their common offset is not.
  • Uncertainty of a mean of many sensors: the reference's contribution does not shrink with √n.
  • Two measurements made with the same instrument minutes apart: drift and environment are largely common.

The GUM gives the full expression with covariance terms; in practice, identify shared sources and treat them separately from the independent ones.

Frequently asked questions

Do I always need to compute covariances?
No. Restructure the model so shared components appear once, then combine the rest as independent. That handles most practical cases.

References

  1. [1]JCGM 100:2008 — Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM)

General technical guidance written against the cited sources. It is not regulatory or legal advice and does not replace the applicable standard, guideline or a qualified reviewer's judgement.

Related articles