What a temperature mapping protocol should contain
The protocol is the contract for the study: fix the purpose, limits, sensor plan and analysis rules before a single logger is placed.
A mapping study is only as defensible as its protocol. Write and approve it before the study, and analyse the data against it afterwards — not the other way round.
Minimum contents
- Purpose and scope: which space, which products, which storage condition (e.g. 2–8 °C, 15–25 °C).
- Acceptance criteria: the limits every sensor must stay within, and how an excursion is defined.
- Sensor plan: number, locations (three-dimensional), rationale for each, and a diagram.
- Sensor calibration: calibration status, traceability and the uncertainty accepted for the study.
- Sampling interval and duration, and the loading condition (empty, loaded, or both).
- Analysis method: which statistics identify hot and cold spots; how gaps and faults are handled.
- Report contents and who reviews and approves the report.
Why the analysis rules belong in the protocol
If the hot spot is chosen as 'highest maximum' after the data are in, someone will ask whether 'highest mean' would have pointed elsewhere. Deciding the criterion first removes that argument and lets the analysis be repeated by anyone.
The analysis rules, written before the data exist
Most of a protocol is uncontroversial. The part that decides whether the study survives scrutiny is the set of rules for turning readings into findings, because every one of them can be chosen after the fact to produce a more convenient answer.
| Rule | The argument it forecloses |
|---|---|
| Hot spot = highest per-sensor maximum | Whether highest mean would have pointed at a different shelf |
| Excursion = any reading outside the limits, or outside for ≥ N minutes | Whether a single 8.1 °C reading counts |
| Limits inclusive or exclusive at exactly 8.0 °C | Whether the boundary reading passed |
| Which sensors are in scope for acceptance | Whether the ambient reference sensor just failed the study |
| How uncertainty is handled at the limit | Whether 8.02 °C with U = 0.3 °C is a pass |
| What happens to data from a failed sensor | Whether it is dropped silently or the study is now short of sensors |
| Minimum data completeness for a valid study | Whether a sensor missing 14 hours still supports a conclusion |
Prerequisites, which are where studies actually stall
The protocol should state what must be true before anyone places a logger: every sensor calibrated, with certificates attached and covering the range of the study; clocks synchronised to a single source and the synchronisation recorded; the loading condition established and photographed; the space operating normally with plant, lighting and door discipline in their routine state. Each of these has ended studies after the fact, and each takes minutes to confirm beforehand.
Approve it before you execute it
The protocol is approved before execution for the same reason acceptance criteria are written before the data arrive: it is the only moment at which the rules are not yet influenced by the result. Two signature dates in the wrong order is a finding on its own, regardless of what the study found. Where a rule genuinely turns out to be wrong, the route is a recorded deviation and an amendment with its own approvals, not a quiet edit.
- Give the protocol a unique identifier and version, and reference it in the report and on every data file.
- Include the sensor plan with a rationale for each position — the list answers what, only the rationale answers why.
- State the duration and why it is sufficient: enough defrost cycles, a normal working day, the season being bounded.
- State the sampling interval and the event it is chosen to resolve, rather than a habit inherited from the last study.
- Name who may execute, who reviews and who approves, and make the report approvals match.
Frequently asked questions
- Who should approve a temperature mapping protocol?
- The study owner and the quality function at minimum; for GMP sites, the same roles that approve qualification protocols.
- Can a contractor's template be used as the protocol?
- Yes, after review against your own requirements — acceptance criteria, scope and analysis rules are your decisions and must be reflected in it.
References
- [1]WHO Technical Supplement 8 to TRS 961 Annex 9: Temperature mapping of storage areas (2015)
- [2]WHO Technical Report Series 961, Annex 9: Model guidance for the storage and transport of time- and temperature-sensitive pharmaceutical products (2011)
General technical guidance written against the cited sources. It is not regulatory or legal advice and does not replace the applicable standard, guideline or a qualified reviewer's judgement.
Have a question on this topic?
Ask ValiTrac AI and see the evidence and calculation behind the answer.
Ask ValiTrac AIFree calculator: Sampling interval
See what a logger actually records from the same 24 hours at 1, 5, 15, 30 or 60 minute intervals, and watch a real excursion disappear.
Open the calculatorTemperature Mapping on ValiTrac
Analyse logger data and identify data-quality issues, statistics, hot/cold spots and excursions.
Explore mappingRelated articles
What is temperature mapping?
Why regulated storage spaces are mapped, what a study produces, and how the results are used.
What a temperature mapping report should contain
A report is a technical record that lets a reader who was not present understand what was done, what was found and what was decided.
Temperature mapping report: a worked example
A worked mapping report for a 2–8 °C cold room: per-sensor statistics, hot and cold spots, an excursion and the acceptance decision. Demo data throughout.