Skip to content
VTValiTracAI
Temperature Mapping

Common temperature mapping mistakes

Most failed studies fail before the loggers are placed — in the plan, the metadata or the calibration.

ValiTrac AI editorialUpdated 2026-09-132 min read
  • Sizing the study to the loggers available instead of the space.
  • Uncalibrated or out-of-date loggers, or calibration at a different range from the study.
  • No unique sensor identifiers or location descriptions, so the data cannot be mapped back to the space.
  • Sensors on surfaces, in airflow from a diffuser, or at ceiling height rather than product height.
  • Sampling intervals too long to see door events and defrost cycles.
  • Studies too short to include a weekend, a delivery day or a defrost.
  • Temperature unit assumed from the values rather than confirmed.
  • Timestamps in mixed time zones or with daylight-saving jumps, merged without checking.
  • Deciding the hot/cold-spot criterion after seeing the data.
  • A report that never says what the study could not show.

ValiTrac's pre-flight and data-quality stages exist to catch the metadata, unit and timestamp problems on this list before any statistic is computed — and to refuse to guess the unit.

Frequently asked questions

What is the most common temperature mapping mistake?
Deciding the sensor plan from the loggers on hand rather than from the space, followed closely by sensors placed at the wrong height or on surfaces.
Can mapping data in Fahrenheit be analysed with Celsius limits?
Only after explicit conversion with the unit confirmed from the logger export, never inferred from the magnitude of the values.

References

  1. [1]WHO Technical Supplement 8 to TRS 961 Annex 9: Temperature mapping of storage areas (2015)

General technical guidance written against the cited sources. It is not regulatory or legal advice and does not replace the applicable standard, guideline or a qualified reviewer's judgement.

Related articles