Accreditation bodies and the ILAC MRA
National accreditation bodies assess laboratories to ISO/IEC 17025; the ILAC Mutual Recognition Arrangement makes those certificates equivalent worldwide.
Accreditation is a third-party attestation of competence against ISO/IEC 17025, for a defined scope. Accreditation bodies are themselves peer-evaluated within regional cooperations (EA, APAC, IAAC, AFRAC, ARAC) and internationally under ILAC. The MRA means a calibration certificate from an accredited laboratory in one signatory economy is recognised in another.
What to verify
- The accreditation body is an ILAC MRA signatory for calibration.
- The laboratory's accreditation number and scope are listed on the body's public directory and are current.
- The certificate carries the accreditation symbol and number — a plain letterhead certificate from an accredited laboratory may be a non-accredited calibration.
ILAC-P10 sets the policy that makes this matter: accreditation bodies expect traceability to be demonstrated through accredited calibration or NMI services.
How the recognition chain works
Accreditation is a third-party attestation of competence against ISO/IEC 17025, for a defined scope. What makes a certificate from another country mean anything is that accreditation bodies are themselves peer-evaluated: regionally through cooperations such as EA in Europe, APAC in Asia-Pacific and IAAC in the Americas, and globally through the ILAC Mutual Recognition Arrangement. A signatory's accredited certificates are recognised as equivalent by every other signatory, which is what stops every border being a fresh assessment.
| Link | Attests |
|---|---|
| ILAC MRA | That signatory accreditation bodies operate equivalently |
| Regional cooperation (EA, APAC, IAAC) | Peer evaluation of the accreditation body |
| Accreditation body (UKAS, DAkkS, A2LA, NABL, …) | That this laboratory is competent, for this scope |
| Laboratory's accredited scope | Which quantities, ranges, methods and CMCs are covered |
| The certificate | That this calibration was performed within that scope, with this uncertainty |
Every row is per-scope rather than per-organisation, and the recognition only reaches as far as the bottom row. A certificate for work outside the accredited scope, issued by an excellent laboratory accredited by an MRA signatory, carries none of it.
Verifying, in about two minutes
- Confirm the accreditation body is an ILAC MRA signatory for calibration — the signatory list is public, and testing-only signatories exist.
- Find the laboratory on the body's public directory by its accreditation number, and confirm the accreditation is current. Symbols on certificate templates outlive suspensions.
- Open the published scope and find the row covering your quantity, range and method. This is the step that is skipped and the one that most often fails.
- Check the certificate carries the accreditation symbol or a reference to the accreditation, and that the work described is inside that row.
- For the uncertainty, compare against the CMC in that row. It should be equal or larger; smaller is a red flag under ILAC-P14.
Why this is the load-bearing check
ILAC-P10 is the policy that makes accreditation matter for traceability rather than merely for reassurance: accreditation bodies expect traceability to be demonstrated through accredited calibration or an NMI service. Using a non-accredited provider is not absolutely forbidden, but it moves the burden onto you — you must then demonstrate that provider's competence, traceability and uncertainty yourself, which means assessing the supplier, reviewing their method and budget, and evidencing their own references. That is a serious piece of work, and it is almost always cheaper to use an accredited supplier.
Frequently asked questions
- Is a certificate from an ISO 9001-certified laboratory equivalent?
- No. ISO 9001 certifies a management system; it does not assess measurement competence or verify uncertainty claims.
References
- [1]ILAC Mutual Recognition Arrangement (ILAC MRA)
- [2]ILAC-P10: ILAC Policy on Metrological Traceability of Measurement Results
General technical guidance written against the cited sources. It is not regulatory or legal advice and does not replace the applicable standard, guideline or a qualified reviewer's judgement.
Have a question on this topic?
Ask ValiTrac AI and see the evidence and calculation behind the answer.
Ask ValiTrac AIFree calculator: Laboratory finder
State the range, the uncertainty you need and what you are sending for calibration. See which accredited laboratories cover it, with the CMC and accreditation number behind every match.
Open the calculatorLaboratory Discovery on ValiTrac
Find accredited calibration laboratories by range and required uncertainty, with the scope evidence behind every match.
Find a laboratoryRelated articles
Metrological traceability under ISO/IEC 17025
An unbroken, documented chain of calibrations back to the SI, each with its own stated uncertainty. What ISO/IEC 17025 actually requires you to show.
How to choose a calibration laboratory
Check the accreditation scope for the quantity, range and uncertainty you need, then weigh turnaround, certificate quality and out-of-tolerance handling.
Outsourcing a temperature mapping study: what to specify
A mapping contractor needs your acceptance criteria, layout, operating conditions and reporting expectations. Without them you get a generic study.