Skip to content
ValiTracAI

The reference thermometer's contribution to uncertainty

The reference contributes its certificate uncertainty, drift since calibration, and any interpolation or self-heating effect. Together they set the floor.

UncertaintyValiTrac AI editorialUpdated 2026-10-093 min read
  • Calibration uncertainty: from the certificate, at the relevant point, divided by its coverage factor.
  • Drift: estimated from calibration history; treated as rectangular with half-width equal to the expected change over the interval, or as a correction with uncertainty if predictable.
  • Interpolation: if the reference was calibrated at 0, 20, 50 °C and used at 35 °C, the fit residuals or a stated interpolation uncertainty apply.
  • Self-heating: for resistance thermometers, the difference between the measurement current used at calibration and in use.
  • Readout: the indicator or bridge used to read the reference has its own calibration and resolution.
  • Immersion: if immersion differs from the calibration condition.

A reference PRT with a 0.01 °C certificate, 0.01 °C annual drift, and a 0.005 °C readout contributes roughly u ≈ 0.009 °C — around 0.02 °C at k = 2 before any bath or UUT effects.

Where the floor comes from

The reference sets the floor on what can be claimed, and the floor is not the number on the certificate — it is that number combined with everything that has happened since. For the reference PRT in the summary above, laid out properly:

A reference PRT on an annual interval, contributions to u
ComponentValueDivisoru (°C)
Certificate, U at k = 20.02020.0100
Drift over the interval, rectangular0.010√30.0058
Readout accuracy and resolution0.00510.0050
Self-heating, residual after correction0.003√30.0017
Interpolation between calibrated points0.002√30.0012
Combined0.0129
As U at k = 20.026
A reference PRT on an annual interval, contributions to u

So a reference advertised as a 0.02 °C thermometer is really a 0.026 °C reference in service, before the bath, the unit under test or anything else in the budget. That is not a criticism of the instrument; it is what the certificate always meant, and the gap between the two numbers is where most optimistic budgets go wrong.

Interpolation between calibration points

A certificate gives corrections at discrete points. Using the reference at a temperature between them means interpolating, and the interpolation has its own uncertainty. For a PRT with a smooth, well-understood characteristic and points every 50 °C, the term is small — a millikelvin or two. For a thermocouple, whose deviation curve is neither smooth nor predictable, interpolating across a wide gap can contribute more than the certificate does. Calibrate at points close to where you work rather than relying on the curve between them.

Keeping the floor low

  • Shorten the interval, or make the drift term time-proportional by recording the date of use. Drift is usually the second-largest term and the easiest to attack.
  • Calibrate the reference and readout as a system where they stay together. A system calibration removes the separate readout term, and is usually smaller than the two evaluated apart.
  • Measure self-heating rather than bounding it: read at the normal current and at half, and multiply the difference by 4/3 to get the correction.
  • Add interim checks — an ice point trended monthly. They shrink the drift term by evidence and they are what locates the onset of a change if the instrument is ever found out of tolerance.
  • Handle it as the reference standard it is. A single thermal shock or a knock can move a PRT by more than a year of drift, and the certificate will not know.

Frequently asked questions

Can a reference with a 0.03 °C certificate support a 0.05 °C calibration claim?
Only if all other contributions combine to less than about 0.04 °C at k = 2, which is unlikely once drift, bath and UUT effects are included. Budget it before promising it.

References

  1. [1]JCGM 100:2008 — Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM)
  2. [2]EA-4/02 M: Evaluation of the Uncertainty of Measurement in Calibration

General technical guidance written against the cited sources. It is not regulatory or legal advice and does not replace the applicable standard, guideline or a qualified reviewer's judgement.

Related articles