Skip to content
ValiTracAI

How to read a scope of accreditation

A scope lists, per quantity, the range, the calibration and measurement capability and the method — so it says what a laboratory can certify, and how well.

Laboratory DiscoveryValiTrac AI editorialUpdated 2026-10-083 min read

Accreditation bodies publish each laboratory's scope as a table. For temperature, a typical row reads: 'Platinum resistance thermometers, by comparison in stirred liquid baths, −80 °C to 250 °C, CMC 0.01 °C to 0.02 °C.' Each element constrains what the laboratory may claim.

Reading each column

  • Measured quantity / instrument type: what can be calibrated (thermometers, loggers, chambers, indicators).
  • Range: the temperatures covered; look for gaps between ranges.
  • CMC: the expanded uncertainty (k = 2) the laboratory can achieve for a near-ideal device. ILAC-P14 forbids reporting less than it.
  • Method or remarks: comparison, fixed point, simulation; bath or block; immersion conditions.
  • Location: permanent laboratory or site; the site CMC is usually larger.

If your logger has 0.1 °C resolution, a laboratory with 0.005 °C CMC gives you no better certificate than one with 0.02 °C — resolution dominates either way.

A temperature scope, read column by column
Instrument typeRangeMethod / mediumCMC (k = 2)
Platinum resistance thermometers−80 to 250 °CComparison, stirred liquid baths0.015 °C
Platinum resistance thermometers250 to 660 °CComparison, furnace0.10 °C
Thermocouples, base metal0 to 1100 °CComparison, furnace0.6 °C
Indicating instruments and data loggers−30 to 150 °CComparison, climatic chamber0.20 °C
Climatic chambers, in situ−20 to 60 °COn site, per EURAMET cg-200.35 °C
A temperature scope, read column by column

Four things to notice in that table

First, the rows are the unit of accreditation, not the laboratory. Second, the medium changes everything: rows one and four are both temperature, and the CMC differs by more than a factor of ten because one is a probe in a bath and the other is a logger in air. Third, look for gaps between ranges — a scope reading −80 to 250 and then 250 to 660 is continuous, but one reading −80 to 200 and 250 to 660 has a hole in it that will not be mentioned when you send an instrument for 220 °C. Fourth, on-site rows carry their own, larger CMCs.

Matching the row to your job

  • Identify what your instrument is in the scope's language. A data logger is an indicating instrument, not a thermometer, and it belongs in the chamber row.
  • Confirm your points sit inside the range, including any extreme the instrument has to cover — an excursion to 8.4 °C needs coverage at 8.4 °C.
  • Read the method column. A scope that lists only comparison in stirred liquid baths cannot calibrate a logger that measures air, however good the CMC looks.
  • Check whether on-site work is listed separately, if that is what you need.
  • Expect your certificate's uncertainty to exceed the CMC. If it does not, ask how the budget was built.

The check that saves money

Work out your instrument's own floor before comparing CMCs. A logger with 0.1 °C resolution contributes 0.029 °C from resolution alone, so its expanded uncertainty cannot fall much below 0.06 °C whatever the laboratory does. Against that, a laboratory with a 0.005 °C CMC gives you a certificate essentially identical to one with 0.02 °C — and usually charges more for it. Choose on scope coverage, certificate quality and turnaround instead, because on uncertainty they are the same supplier.

Frequently asked questions

What does 'electrical simulation' in a scope mean?
Calibration of an indicator by injecting a known resistance or voltage instead of a temperature — it calibrates the electronics, not the sensor.

References

  1. [1]ILAC-P14: ILAC Policy for Measurement Uncertainty in Calibration
  2. [2]ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories

General technical guidance written against the cited sources. It is not regulatory or legal advice and does not replace the applicable standard, guideline or a qualified reviewer's judgement.

Related articles